The Sock 'Em, Bust 'Em Board Because that's our custom

They just need two

Time is ticking here in camp and Dana Holgorsen and his assistants are closer by the day to designing depth charts. West Virginia has two wide receivers and needs two more, meaning one issue at the start of camp is gone and has been replaced by another.

CAMP BEGAN WITH questions about who’ll play inside receiver with and behind Daikiel Shorts, and that took a bad turn with news that one candidate, redshirt freshman Jacky Marcellus, would miss the season with a knee injury.

Camp is closing with answers there and questions at wide receiver.

Holgorsen said Logan Moore, who competed for the quarterback spot in the spring, has earned a spot at inside receiver and Jordan Thompson has been “phenomenal” so far.

“He may be turning a corner toward making plays,” Holgorsen said.

Right now, there are only names behind wide receivers Mario Alford and Kevin White. Holgorsen said he’d like to get two backups out of junior K.J. Myers, sophomores Vernon Davis and Devonte Mathis and redshirt freshman Shelton Gibson and their 25 career receptions.

He won’t say what he did to injure his left ankle and rob him of the first week-plus of preseason camp, but K.J. Dillon, injured at home, is back at practice and unencumbered.

He was a little more willing to discuss the details of lifestyle changes he has to make to manage living with diabetes. It’s new and different, but it’s not hard. Not for Dillon. If you know him, you know he rather likes a challenge.

“When you make the main thing the main thing, you’re on the right track,” he said.

Continue reading…

Shannon Dawson blindsides Paul Millard but reminds the quarterback that though the drill may stop, the focus on ball security can never end.

You might think this is nothing, but remember, Millard fumbled seven times, lost four fumbles and threw six interceptions in seven games — that’s two starts and parts of five others — last season.

Video blog: Day 12

It’s Practice Day 11, though, and that’s the framework for today’s vlog.

Yes!

Dana Holgorsen’s well-timed thoughts on his running backs, on Rushel shell’s ascent, on the need for Dreamius Smith to get going, on Eli Wellman showing signs work well in conjunction with today’s look at the position as told by the players and position coach.

“That’s one of the biggest things Dana had lacking early — just not a lot of depth in that room,” Seider said of fourth-year WVU coach Dana Holgorsen. “There were a couple games when he said he first got here and he was down to nobody. He was down to a fullback playing tailback.

“Guys are going to get banged up. The Big 12 Conference is very physical, so you need a plethora of guys and not have to change what you’re doing when somebody goes down.”

So, the Mountaineers are getting creative in how to use each back, keep them fresh and flummox the defense. The “20” personnel — that’s two backs and no tight ends — and the versatility of the six traditional running backs could get as many as three backs on the field at the same time.

“It wouldn’t surprise me at all,” Smith said of that possibility.

Hypothetically, Smith (5-foot-11, 216 pounds) and Shell (6-0, 210) could line up in the backfield with Smallwood (5-11, 200) in the slot on one play, and then Smallwood could shift to the backfield on the next play to give WVU a three-back look without changing personnel.

They can all carry the ball, obviously, but to stay on the field they’ll need to block and catch passes, too.

Seider isn’t concerned about the depth chart or how he’ll keep as many as six running backs — depending on if prized recruit Thomas-Williams (6-0, 221) redshirts or not — touches.

“You worry about that when the season starts,” Seider said. “We always figure it out. We played three or four guys last year a majority of the games. If a guy gets hot, you don’t take the hot guy out. When we get back to playing 80, 90 snaps a game, it takes care of itself. When you’re playing 50, 60 snaps a game, then you’ve got issues getting guys carries.”

Dana Holgorsen: Day 12

A mixed bag today with insight on redshirts, standouts, personnel, how depth benefits live reps and NCAA reform. Is it me, or are these communiques really good so far?

“Bad.”

Right you are, Shannon Dawson, as long as you’re talking about West Virginia’s third-down play last season.

You might even be underselling it. The Mountaineers were perhaps beyond bad converting just 31.89 percent of the time, which was bad enough to rank No. 116 out of 124 FBS teams.

The Mountaineers were No. 30 in most punts and No. 18 in third downs per game and, well, you get the idea. The offense didn’t have the players or the plans to stay on the field and do what people had come to expect from Dana Holgorsen’s offense.

Continue reading…

Friday Feedback

Welcome to the Friday Feedback, which would like to avail itself to West Virginia University. In another capacity. In another career. Because, oh, my God. You win, Oklahoma. You win.

This is my fault, I guess, but we paid zero attention here to colleges initiating “deregulation of eating” Aug. 1, and maybe that was because football started a day earlier or because we went over that deal earlier and with aplomb. Anyhow, it happened and it’s happening and I’ve even talked to some players about it (right now, they don’t notice a difference because they aren’t in class … and we haven’t been allowed to talk to anyone who’s a walk-on thus far).

You know this, but I’m a sucker for ingenuity and new ways to do old things, which is why I’m down with the Sooners today.

Food trucks, y’all.

“We don’t have facilities in all the places they would need to be, so the idea is to have a mobile fueling station and perhaps some additional trailers that have refrigeration capabilities that can operate as a prep kitchen of sorts,” Castiglione said.

Castiglione stresses that the truck is “not about largesse or excessiveness” and more about “putting ingenuity to work,” but does say that he fears the new rule will create an unnecessary competition of sorts.

“I realize the idea was to give institutions the flexibility to do what they want within their means,” Castiglione said. “But it’s now so flexible that schools can provide full meals to athletes at any time, and there will be some schools that will undoubtedly push that envelope. The next thing people will be doing is a comparative analysis for recruiting as to what schools offer more.”

First, “mobile fueling station” is satire of the highest quality. Second, this is amazing. This is so amazing. Oklahoma did its homework. The Sooners rolled out this idea at the start and set a trend that will be impossible to top short of Air Force dropping field rations on campus. And here’s the best part. It is clearly — clearly — a bell and whistle and Oklahoma will get a lot of attention for it, and deservedly so.

In this particular era, that’s significant. That much was clear from the outset in April, when the idea for unlimited meals was first endorsed.

You better believe it’s going to create a disparity between the haves and the have nots, between those who can afford to give their players more and those who simply cannot.

Suddenly, the kitchen is the new weight room in recruiting, and the quality, the diversity and the sheer number of meals are the things parents will be asking about on visits and what cunning coaches will be bragging about when in the presence of a recruit.

This totally transcends the quality and the variety of the meals, famously highlighted by The Product, and even the idea schools could make use of famous restaurants and celebrity chefs — and I wouldn’t discount the latter sooner rather than later, and even as a official member of the university as long as that chef has the proper certification.

But what the Sooners did was come up with something really cool — I won’t argue this: Food trucks rule. — and modern and thus attractive, but they made it seem like it’s all about the convenience and welfare of the student-athletes. And I’ll go along with that.

College sports is a copycat business. You’ll see a peer mimic this soon, though perhaps not right away so it won’t be so blatant, and I want it to happen here. You probably don’t know this about me, but I’m a fantastic cook and I have a dream and a swelling savings account that one day (far, far away) will address the skill and the vision. Go ahead and check the background of the Tier 4 set. Top shelf above my left shoulder is a toy taco truck. Trophy to my right is for a cooking competition. You see where I’m going with this. I see where colleges are going with this Oklahoma action. Put me in coach.

Onto the Feedback. As always, comments appear as posted.  In other words, don’t get mad at me.

SheikYbuti said:

Why in the world would we play at Northern Kentucky? We should never (and the Rock means NEVER) play on the road at a low-major, no matter what kind of regional reputation it enjoys. Why not schedule another home game against — I dunno — Robert Morris or someone. Baffling. Utterly baffling.

It is, but it isn’t, either. I get the perception involved, but there are positives, too. Huggins has known the NKU coach a long time, so this is probably a solid, which is what Huggins does. It’s also damn near Cincinnati, which is where Huggins has roots and where Devin Williams is from. It’s an hour form Juwan Staten’s Dayton, too. Elijah Macon’s Columbus is two hours away. It’s a pretty convenient homecoming because Huggins can’t get Xavier and likely won’t get Cincinnati. And it’s a road test that the Mountaineers should conquer, but will definitely benefit from early in the season. Lots of new and young guys on this squad and that’ll be the first time on an opponent’s floor.

And that’s all for basketball until October!

Continue reading…

Video blog: Day eight

More football, more shenanigans.

Dana Holgorsen: Day Eight

Is it just me, or do you get the feeling Dana wants the players to know these next few days really count?