The Sock 'Em, Bust 'Em Board Because that's our custom

And there goes the water cooler

Dana Holgorsen, I say surprisingly, named Clint Trickett his starting quarterback today.

“Clint is 100 percent healthy and is ready to play.” Holgorsen says. “He worked hard last season and showed a lot of ability and leadership and deserves the chance to lead the team as a senior. He will be our starter.”

Mike, you serious? Surprised? 

Letme qualify that: I’m surprised he made the announcement. He’d not done that ever before here. Remember, this is a guy who was announcing his starting quarterback on his radio show on Thursday nights and who has otherwise gone out of his way to keep secrets to maintain edges. So, yeah, this arched my brow.

But the pick? No surprise at all.

“Right now, sometimes we do recruit against those non-power five or non-high visibility conferences or whatever you want to call it, but we’re going to get to a point where we never recruit against them and the kid is either a power five guy or he’s not,” said a member of a major conference football program who requested anonymity.

“Based on the resources we have, based on offering the full cost of attendance, based on how much food we can give him and how much support we can give him and the difference in just the revenue and what the advantages are for a student-athlete being at a power five conference as opposed to a non-power five conference, once that separation happens the difference is going to be that big and that important to them.”

That’s the powder keg. There’s a belief or a concern, if not a downright exultation or fear, that the forthcoming NCAA reform will create and then encourage a larger gap between two distinct classes of Division I schools. The 65 high visibility schools have more resources and want to be allowed to do more with those resources so that they may better provide for their student-athletes. The rest of Division I — and for the purpose of this exercise, it’s really the FBS — is not as affluent and thus not as capable of doing as much to make things better or easier for student-athletes.

You don’t need a sherpa to know where that’s going, especially when you consider the high visibility programs are going to have a certain legislative authority.

So in the second part of our five-part series this week, I took a look at what separation will exist — that is, if you believe it will exist — and why. What will it look like? What will it mean? What can either side do about it? Clearly, there is a difference of opinion on this matter, and it’s a matter of both fact and belief. Marshall, for example, does not believe it’s getting hosed here. It’s interesting, though, to see and hear why — and I was surprised to hear that Marshall can do more than WVU in one critical area. But on the other side, you have a group that thinks this is a matter of responsibility and welfare, of sense and not cents, and that it’s merely a logical way to handle what already exists.

“I’ve never seen this as a financial matter,” Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said. “There are some things we want to do with student-athletes that have some financial implications, obviously. But the autonomy is about having some prerogatives in managing the organizations that we run and the institutions that we represent.

“Will it create a larger divide? I suppose it’s theoretically possible, but there’s a pretty substantial divide right now. Our Division I membership ranges from $3 million budgets to $170 million budgets. That’s a fairly large gulf already.

“We have apples, bananas and plums and kumquats and persimmons and grapes. We’ve got them all.”

This story is actually about Staten

It is, I promise, but this begins with an odd anecdote.

Bob Huggins was doing his part on the Big 12 summer teleconference last week when someone asked him if Billydee Williams’ name ever came up among the coaches or players during the recruiting process. My hand to God, that happened.

Huggins, who, if I’m being honest, sounded pained and groggy, was not out completely out of it.

“I think the younger generation doesn’t have any idea of who Billy Dee Williams is,” Huggins said of the star of films and commercials and not of his newest player. “I just hope he’s good enough that he’s going to make people remember him.”

Continue reading…

And we’re off. Derek Redd, he of the Marshall beat at our newspaper, gets this thing going by examining a concise question and giving a response that must be anything but concise: What exactly is going on here?

The NCAA is changing — perhaps very soon — and it’s been a long time coming. There are specific issues being debated and there are specific outcomes expected. There are ramifications attached to myriad possibilities. There is concern and excitement that things will never be the same.

We get all that.

What we sometimes lose sight of, especially when we consider how long this has actually been going on and how much activity there is before what we believe to be the conclusion, is why we’re here. It’s pretty important to step back and ask that one question and to make sure we’re aware of what exactly is happening.

We solicited a number of opinions from people quoted and not quoted in the story and we got their answers, and those answers turned down another street or merged into a different area. Next thing you know, there’s a pretty thorough explanation.

So enjoy. It’s long, yeah, but it has to be long because the topic is that deep and the answers are coming at us quickly.

“It’s hard to envision it being any more tumultuous than it is right now,” Bowlsby said. “Generally speaking, it’s not an organization that changes quickly. That would lead you to think that it’s going to calm down and probably evolve more slowly in the future. But it would be very difficult to predict that with any precision right now.”

Whether change speeds up or slows down as the months progress, those associated with college athletics know that, no matter the pace, it is inevitable. And each school will have crucial decisions to make in regards to their respective futures.

“I think each school will have to pick and choose, based upon what they can afford, what they’re going to do,” Hamrick said. “The days of standardized rules of every Division I program, I think that’s over.”

Tomorrow? The widening divide between the Haves and Have-nots in Division I … and whether that applies to WVU and Marshall.

Birthdays for everyone!


Two years ago today, college football’s commissioners formally recommended starting a college football playoff, which we now know as the College Football Playoff. Ugh.

It’s an imperfect process still, but it is also in its infancy and, like other innovations, probably needs to crawl before it walks and fall before it rises. It will and it will and we ought to be patient about all that.

That said, it’s pretty awesome. It’s something we’ve been sort of begging for for years, never mind the relative successes of the BCS that more often than not did pit the two best teams against one another, and we have it. It’s also a little more meaningful here because we also know that West Virginia has a say in the matter, so to speak, with Oliver Luck on the CFP’s pressed-for-time selection committee.

The misconception here is that he’s interested in the 125 teams in the Football bowl Subdivision. No one should be because the number of teams who are even reasonable long shots for a national title is much, much smaller.

Luck said he’d start in the summer with a top 25, which means beginning with 40 or 50 teams. If what he hears is true, he won’t even have to concern himself that many teams.

“The plan right now, I think, is each of the sitting ADs will be assigned to a particular conference and they’re going to be the subject matter experts there,” Luck said. “My understanding is I wouldn’t be assigned the Big 12, but maybe the Pac-12 and I’d become on expert on that and maybe Conference USA.

“Then as we go into discussions, if there is a question about Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, whatever, or someone in C-USA, I’d be the one to address it.”

I’ll say it: There was a time when administrators at WVU wouldn’t have been considered to be a part of that process. Today, it’s sort of a feather in the cap and a reminder of how that was then and this is now. On our state’s 151st birthday, that’s pretty cool. I mean, you could be floundering in the Big East and ready to jump off the New River Gorge Bridge.

Continue reading…

The comment section, though…

Last week’s little  blurb from Dana Holgorsen about preparing for Alabama got some traction in Alabama, which is to be expected. They’re football-mad there and they have their deities and their reasons for it, but, man, do they have some interesting thoughts about a rather harmless Holgorsen comment.

Time to take the temperature because I sense the blood is beginning to boil a little bit. Maybe it’s the heat and the doldrums from the dead of summer. Maybe it’s the slow acceptance of a certain reality. Maybe it’s something else. I don’t know, but I want to know.

What bothers you more?

Is it that WVU is a 24-point underdog in a season-opening game in the Georgia Dome against Alabama … or that the Mountaineers are expected to kind of tank again and were picked as only the 78th best team in the country by a pretty respected voice who’s been kind to WVU in the past?

So this isn’t a Big 12 contender, but we knew that already. Instead, I see WVU as a borderline bowl team – not three-win bad, as some have suggested, but hovering somewhere between five and seven wins.

Continue reading…

Bounce house?

Bob Huggins has spent a lot of time this offseason insisting his team will be all right, that it will get back to rebounding and defending, that it’ll be able to guard opponents better because similarly sized players can switch things and avoid mismatches. Absent from that list? That West Virginia will score better or more often in the 2014-15 season.

Take away the second-, third- and fifth-leading scorers and that’s a concern. Watch subtractions lead to an addition in the focus on the likely Big 12 preseason player of the year and that’s a concern. Rid the team of its top three 3-point shooter and … actually, that might not be too concerning.

Continue reading…

It’s starting to make some sense

The second thing that stands out about WVU’s newest basketball recruit, Billydee Williams, is that his playing time and production were both inconsistent bordering on erratic.

It’s alarming, and whether it’s fair or not, it’s concerning when you’re dealing with a junior college player. There’s a perception attached to a kid who toils at that level, and if you’re not careful it can lead you to presumptuous conclusion.

What we can fairly say about Williams is that he was capable of scoring and even rebounding when he was able to play a healthy share of minutes. What we can’t say yet is why the PT seesawed the way it did — and that has to be question No. 1 when we meet, right?

Maybe not, because I’m starting to get a more clear picture about Williams as a guy who was new to his team last year, who played with a bunch of veterans, who played for a pretty good coach who really knows what he’s doing and who is perhaps only guilty of fitting in on a good squad that made the NJCAA quarterfinals last season for a reason.

 Williams is the sixth member of last season’s SPC team headed to a four-year program. The others are point guard Sekou Harris (South Dakota), shooting guard Roderick Lawrence (Mississippi), forward Ryan Martin (Tennessee Tech), forward Malik Nichols (Hofstra) and center Michael Karena (Wright State).

 

WVU looking for FCS foes

This has been whispered about for a few days, but I’m assured WVU will play host to once and future FCS power Youngstown State in 2016. There was a tale being told that the contract is for 2016 and 2018, but that’s not true. Not yet at least. WVU is probably going to fill spaces in 2018 and before and beyond with FCS schools and Youngstown State may indeed get the call in 2018.

That’s unusual, for sure, and that’s going to furrow some brows, I’m sure, but I really wonder why anyone should be that upset. No one’s clamoring to see FCS schools so I don’t see why people would be upset if the roster of FCS opponents lacks variety. Mad that there’s a FCS team on the schedule? Go right ahead. Mad that it’s the same one, say, twice in three seasons? Misplaced anger, I say. FCS schools are asking for more and more money now, but the Penguins are relatively close and probably wouldn’t need as much to make the trip, which could then lower the amount they demand.