Special thanks to Rushel Shell for balling up last week’s question and throwing it in the receptacle. He was good Saturday, which then begs the question: Was he ever bad? JaJuan Seider would argue no.

Seider’s grades for Shell in the first two games were 100 and 96. He liked the reads Shell made. He didn’t have a problem with how he was attacking the areas that were supposed to open up for him. All that was missing was yardage, and Seider trusted the line would develop to open those holes and Shell would keep finding and attacking them.

“Sometimes it just doesn’t work out,” Shell said. “Sometimes you don’t get the ball. Sometimes you don’t get big holes. I felt like that was part of the issue, but as long as we’re winning, it doesn’t matter.”

Today’s edition? Similarly silly!