The Sock 'Em, Bust 'Em Board Because that's our custom

Friday fallback

So no F Double today. I’m learning some things about this Big 12 and one is that it’s going to take some time to get places. In order to get to Austin, I have to get to San Antonio first and since I want to get to Austin at a decent time, I have to leave early.

I’m already in the air by now on my second flight bound for San Antonio as you read this and with the way these weeks stack up now, I knew yesterday I wasn’t going to have time to do F Double properly.

Can’t promise you it won’t be the same story next week, but I’ll just try to use this past week as a learning experience and get a little better next week. This week won’t make be a worse blogger. In the long run, I think we’ll look back and see at it as a blessing.

Moving on, I’d be happy to hear your thoughts on the game and likely game plans and ideas you’ll see in play or whatever Gus Johnson drinking games you’ll have on the table.

Keep an eye on WVU’s five-receiver set, though. It debuted last week — and I mean debut in the sense there were five receivers and not four with a running back — but was a Baylor ploy because of the way the Mountaineers saw the Bears defending empty backfields.

Doesn’t necessarily mean WVU will do this against Texas because Texas might have a better and thus discouraging tactic to defend it. But it’s at least another caliber of weapon in WVU’s arsenal because it looks and works so well. And Shawne Alston isn’t traveling to Austin or playing in the game, so WVU is again without its full range of running backs and might have to think outside the box again.

Continue reading…

Eyes of Texas, and many others, on Daron Roberts

The Longhorns graduate and Texas native returns to the scene of his prime Saturday in a most unusual spot.

Damn near everyone who is invested in West Virginia’s eighth-ranked football team is at least attuned to the cornerback play before the game against No. 11 Texas. Roberts coaches the cornerback and he knows things have to get better or they will get worse. “I told our guys that offensive coordinators are not going to stop passing the ball because they don’t want to hurt your feelings,” Roberts told me.

Amid all the ideas and suggestions and possibilities being floated around this week, that is the truth.

That is football.

Continue reading…

Greetings, with feet still on the home base before an early flight tomorrow morning and then a probably-faster-than-the-law-allows drive down to Austin. I hope we’ve done our job thus far and looked at WVU and Texas and their game Saturday night, but there’s always more to say and always more to ask.

So meet me at 11 a.m. for the weekly WVU Sports Chat. Here is your direct link and here is your mobile link. You may drop your questions in the queue now.

Meantime, Texas is sneaky good on offense because the Longhorns decided to adapt or else.

“We need to have better offensive play, therefore our quarterback needs to play better and the one thing we need to do better is score more points,” Brown said a few days after picking sophomore David Ash to lead the offense in 2012. “This is a points-driven league and if you start looking at the number of points we’ve scored, we’ve been averaging in the upper 20s a game.

“That’s not enough. The year we won the national championship (2005) we averaged 51 points per game. We averaged 40-plus points for a long time. We need to get back to those numbers.”

Hey! It’s 4-0 WVU v. 4*-0 Texas

Looks like Mike Gundy was right and Joe Bergeron did fumble on what turned out to be the game’s deciding play Saturday night. The Big 12 Conference called and “apologized profusely” for the error.

The source said Anderson told Gundy the call was botched by head linesman Brad Edwards, who signaled touchdown too soon without proper view of the ball, which was fumbled before it broke the plane of the end zone.

Edwards was originally positioned on the goal line on the UT sideline, then sprinted toward the pile and put his arms in the air.

(Update: Uhh, maybe not?)

Continue reading…

Surely by now you caught the Grantland piece Michael Weinreb wrote about Dana Holgorsen. Good stuff about a story you know, but it was delivered from a slightly askew angle — ” … his mullet spiked into a Noltean panorama of peaks and valleys, as if it had spent the afternoon waging war with a family of vengeful squirrels while the gray matter beneath it processed the subtleties of the Air Raid offense.”

Yes!

Within the story, you’ll find a variety of diversions in the form of footnotes and links to stories and video clips. There’s also a link to my book.

Right here.

Study it. Check the cover. There’s a white dot, sort of a bizzaro USA Today thing, that screams WITH NEW EPILOGUE.

The second version is out now and available for just a little bit more, but that’s with reason. The old epilogue was restructured to become another chapter. It is called “Seventy” and I’ll let you guess what that covers. The new epilogue brings us into the new future, since we previously left off at the beginning of the offseason.

The offseason was eventful, both tragic and exciting, and it deserved to serve as the fresh coat of paint on this old house.

All in all, a few dozen additional pages. I went back and colored in some earlier chapters, and got a major assist from Paul Rhoads, and made sure to do more with the 2011 season, with Dana getting a little reflective about exactly what happened and how it came to be.

There’s also new content, including more detail than previously delivered about the move to the Big 12 Conference. Oliver Luck was kind enough to tell me things he’d never told anyone before and Chuck Neinas threw in, as well. Some questions were left unanswered, or unasked, before and some things were not mentioned or not fully explained. I think we fixed that this time.

Carry on …

Ouch!

Perhaps you’e heard, but WVU’s defense had a bad, bad day against Baylor. Immediately — and actually, even within the game — there were cries for changes and even Joe DeForest suggested he might coordinate a defense against Texas with different people than we saw playing against Baylor.

Yet the depth chart, meaningless as that is, remains the same and no one would tell you of a change if there was one. That said, there are points to be made against making changes, namely that the second-string might not be all that and if you go with a strong-teamer, you might lose that first-teamer … and the Mountaineers as not in a position of depth that allows them to lose many people, if any.

“I don’t feel like it’s a personnel issue,” Cook said. “We always had the right plays called and we were in the right place to make plays. This is a team defense. It’s my fault. It’s the defensive line’s fault. It’s the linebackers’ fault. It’s everyone’s fault. You don’t give up 63 points because of a couple players.”

The approach, like the depth chart, won’t change and these coaches are instead taking an individual account of their contributions to the overall results.

Joey Madsen for Heisman!

For some reason, one of my favorite parts of this season is getting the email Sunday that declares the weekly award winners for offense, defense, special teams and the scout teams. So far we’ve discovered Maurice Zereoue is on the roster and that K.J. Dillon was in the hospital that Sunday before he won the special teams award.

We’ve also seen Geno Smith, as well as Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey, consistently post ridiculous numbers, yet not consistently win the award — and Dana Holgorsen has pretty much explained it by saying that he could give it to one of those three every week, but that wouldn’t be fair to all the others, like an Andrew Buie or Shawne Alston.

So Sunday, a little more than 24 hours after that 70-63 thing happened, Dana pegged Joey Madsen as the offensive player of the week and said a day later it was probably Madsen’s best game yet when the coach was asked to explain his pick — and that’s the best part of this. It’s a running storyline that people around the country are tracking and it seems like Dana is obliging by messing with us. Dana further explained things Tuesday by saying while Geno is Geno, someone has to snap the ball to Geno.

No, that really happened.

But Madsen was good he pretty much handled Baylor’s nose guard on his own, which let the guards do other things to help in the run and pass game. Oh the whole, Madsen’s been as good as advertised this season, in equally important roles both on the field and on the sideline, which makes you wonder how far he can go with this.

Dana Holgorsen sizes up Texas

Today’s opening statement preceded the urge to fire up my right hand and be all “Are you guys going to show up Saturday or just call this one in?”

Mack Brown was charmingly effusive in his praise Monday and Dana would not be outdone in his rebuttal. The showmanship was on a hundred thousand million today … which is only slightly larger than the Texas defensive ends.

Geno Smith scary good

It’s been since the halcyon days of Pat White beside Steve Slaton that West Virginia’s offensive reputation has sent people reaching for their thesauruses .. thesauri? … most revealing adjectives. We’re mingling with this new audience now and there is no once-slain conference rival who remembers No. 5 and No. 10 and gets a shiver up their spine.

Yet these Big 12 folks are no less impressed by what’s happening now, which is fun to witness. Kansas Coach Charlie Weis, seemingly one of the smartest men in the room no matter what room he’s in, went with an easier choice or words Monday.

“What Geno Smith did the other day, when you look at the numbers, you say, ‘How can that possibly happen? How can a guy sit there with those types of numbers against a very good competitor?’ ” Kansas Coach Charlie Weis said. “It’s kind of scary.”

Do you know who’s not as impressed? Gen Smith.

Just last night I started regaining the feeling in my cranium after Saturday’s showcase, but it happened and WVU announced its presence with authority. What we’re all left with is this team that’s ranked eighth in the country and the anticipation for a delicious dichotomy Saturday night in one of the country’s best cities. Can’t wait.

But how did we get here? Let’s examine the good and the bad of WVU v. Baylor.

Good: Us!

That’s a screen cap from the DailyMail.com WVU sports page Monday.

Headline: Yes.

Picture: Also yes.

Continue reading…