In this Nov. 19, 2014 file photo, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy speaks in Washington. The Obama administration issued new rules Wednesday to protect the nation’s drinking water and clarify which smaller streams, tributaries and wetlands are covered by anti-pollution and development provisions of the Clean Water Act. McCarthy said the rule will only affect waters that have a “direct and significant” connection to larger bodies of water downstream that are already protected. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)
My inbox is quickly filling up today with statements from the environmental organizations, all eager to get quoted saying something nice about the latest action by the Obama administration’s U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Here’s what EPA said this morning in a press release:
In an historic step for the protection of clean water, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army finalized the Clean Water Rule today to clearly protect from pollution and degredation the streams and wetlands that form the foundation of the nation’s water resources.
The rule ensures that waters protected under the Clean Water Act are more precisely defined and predictably determined, making permitting less costly, easier, and faster for businesses and industry. The rule is grounded in law and the latest science, and is shaped by public input. The rule does not create any new permitting requirements for agriculture and maintains all previous exemptions and exclusions.
The actual language of the final rule is here, and the new definition of “waters of the United States” is here. There’s a Congressional Research Service report about the issue available here (thanks to the Federation of American Scientists), and a setup story from The New York Times has more background.