Writing for Talking Points Memo, Brian Beutler thinks that Republicans taking control of the House could have a positive impact on President Obama’s nominees.
Beutler suggests that without much legislation coming out of the House to occupy the Senate’s time, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) can schedule votes for pending candidates for federal judgeships and administration posts.
[W]hile the House passes legislation the Senate has no interest in considering, Majority Leader Harry Reid will have much more time, if he chooses, to devote to confirming a large backlog of Obama’s judicial and executive branch nominees — particularly numerous non-controversial picks, who will have to be renominated next year.
That’s certainly what advocates would like to see.
“Reid should concentrate Floor time on must pass bills, message and other votes that highlight differences and important matters that are or should be non-controversial, including confirming lifetime federal judges,” Glenn Sugameli, an advocate for swift judicial confirmations, tells TPM. “All of Obama’s nominees to circuit and district courts have had the support of their home-state Republican and Democratic senators and the vast majority have been non-controversial nominees who have been approved by the Judiciary Committee without objection and approved unanimously when they finally receive usually long-delayed Floor votes.”
“If one or more Republican senators force cloture votes on consensus nominees, they will accurately be seen as mindlessly obstructionist,” Sugameli says. “If they do not, nominees will be confirmed quickly.”
However, scheduling and holding floor votes still takes time, and there don’t seem to be any indications that GOP senators will any more accommodating with a 47-seat minority than they were with a 41-seat minority. The TPM piece continues:
That’s not to say that scores of judicial vacancies will be filled immediately, or that President Obama will (finally) see his executive branch fully staffed. Democrats will have a much smaller majority of 53 Senators, and any single Republican will be able to force Democrats to round up 60 votes and spend nearly a week of floor time to get a nominee confirmed.
“I would remind you that actions have consequences and we’re going to have to deal with what the House sends us and, at the other end, it’s three days plus [per filibuster] and all the days add up,” says Reid spokesman Jim Manley.
But one of the biggest hurdles nominees faced this year was a thick legislative agenda: they were literally crowded out by the sheer volume of routine, emergency, and history-making legislation. Next year that won’t be an issue. And that has some advocates seeing a silver lining around the midterm election results.
Hmm. I may be a big fan of Monty Python, but I don’t think I’m ready to start singing along just yet, particularly given that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, just published this call for the restoration of bipartisanship and civility on Politico.com.
Civility and bipartisanship are grounded in common courtesy and giving due consideration to the other person’s point of view. The Founders and earlier generations of Senate leaders presumed civility in structuring a Senate that largely runs without the elaborate rules that govern the House.
Most Senate work is done through negotiations to achieve unanimous consent for time agreements and for the order of amendments and votes. Senate customs, like addressing each other through the chairman or chairwoman, help to depersonalize some of the sharp words heard more and more frequently on the floor.
Of course, an institution like the Senate, with such few rules, is open to abuse. It has suffered in recent years under an explosion of filibusters, threatened filibusters and unexplained holds.