Search this blog
- Back to the buffer zone: Congress moves to reject Obama administration’s ‘stream protection’ rule
- What we can learn from the Blankenship appeal
- Gov. Tomblin: West Virginia’s coal industry ‘likely won’t ever return to the levels that we once saw’
- Manchin receives pension ‘assurance’ from Trump
- More alarms on devastating resurgence of black lung disease, but where’s the political outrage?
- Abandoned mines
- Air pollution
- Alternative energy
- Black lung
- Blankenship Trial
- Blog business
- Climate policy
- Climate science
- Coal ash
- Coal business
- Coal pollution
- Corporate welfare
- Green jobs
- International news
- Legal actions
- Media coverage
- Mine Safety
- Mountaintop Removal
- Peak coal
- Power lines
- Protest actions
- Slurry impoundments
- Strip mine science
- Upcoming events
- Upper Big Branch Disaster
- Water pollution
- Workplace safety
The news Friday evening was certainly welcome for both the United Mine Workers of America union and Murray Energy:
Rank-and-file members of the United Mine Workers of America voted Friday to approve a proposal for a new contract with the Bituminous Coal Operators Association, whose major member company is Murray Energy.
According a statement issued by the UMW, 60.3 percent voted in favor of the new collective bargaining agreement at six Murray Energy mines in West Virginia and Ohio.
As our story noted:
Murray has previously warned that finalizing a new contract with the UMW is a crucial part of his company’s plan to avoid financial default, and has hinted that without a deal he might consider bankruptcy court protection.
While the UMWA membership earlier this summer voted down an earlier contract proposal, the last thing union leaders want is to face a Murray Energy bankruptcy that would certainly not help their current battle to preserve union pensions and health-care benefits.
UMWA President Cecil Roberts said:
This was a tough vote for our members to take. The coal industry is in a depression and more than 50 companies have filed for bankruptcy in the last few years. Thousands have been laid off. The pressures on those who are still working are tremendous and growing.
But despite all that, our members took a courageous stand by voting to try to keep their company operating while maintaining the best wages, benefits and working conditions in the American coal industry.
And Murray CEO Bob Murray said:
This is a good day for Murray American’s UMWA-represented employees, as this agreement will go a long way toward ensuring that our coal mines can keep operating, and our employees working, even in the current depressed coal marketplace.
I was terribly sorry to read confirmation of the horrible news that was circulating Friday and over the weekend:
Bill Howley, founder and editor of The Power Line, died in a single-vehicle motor vehicle collision on the afternoon of Thursday, April 23, 2015, while driving to a WV SUN meeting. He was 62 years old.
He died surrounded by the verdant spring hills of central West Virginia, working hard for the future of his state. He took immense pride and joy in his work with fellow West Virginia energy activists.
Bill was probably the best citizen journalist in West Virginia. His blog, The Power Line: The View from Calhoun County, was essential reading for anyone who wanted to know what was going on in energy issues in West Virginia — especially for those of us who are presumably paid to write about such things. Bill frequently broke news on his blog, and more importantly, he provided key context, background and analysis of what was going on with issues like power line proposals, clean-energy markets, and the dumping of coal-fired power plants onto West Virginia consumers.
Bill’s blog provided invaluable watchdog reporting about West Virginia energy companies, and put the constant harping against clean energy from West Virginia elected officials into some perspective, with posts like this one — I believe his last published work — about the fight against the future in Hawaii.
Over the years, Bill was pretty tough on those of us who make our living covering the news in West Virginia (see here, here, here and here). He was often right about the weakness of media coverage of these issues, though he and I used to have friendly arguments — well, I considered them friendly, and I hope he did — about why that coverage wasn’t better. And once you got to know Bill, and he saw you were willing to put in the time to understand complicated stuff, he would spend countless hours trying to unpack complex stuff.
What I’ll remember most was that Bill seemed to really love what he was doing. The tone of the progressive movement in West Virginia can be pretty rough these days. There’s a lot of anger and hostility, aimed even at folks who are generally on the same side of trying to move our state forward. Personally, I never got that from Bill. He was always fun to talk to and spend time with, no matter how complicated or even depressing the topic of the day happened to be.
This is most painful for Bill’s family and close friends. I can imagine how they feel. Sunday was the anniversary of the car accident that killed my father. So my heart goes out to Bill’s loved ones. I hope they find some peace in knowing how many people Bill touched with his work.
In a blog post a few weeks ago (Politics and the future of the coalfields: ‘What happens here in the hills once the coal runs dry?’), we discussed the potential U.S. Senate run of Charleston lawyer Nick Preservati.
In doing so, I incorrectly reported on his involvement in a lawsuit brought by the natural gas industry over some coal industry miner safety regulations. Preservati did not represent the gas industry in that case; he actually represented the state Board of Coal Mine Health and Safety (subscription required), and was involved in drafting the rule at issue.
The original post has been edited, with strike-thru and underline, to reflect the accurate information.
My apologies for this error.
When I read Mike Harman’s op-ed commentary in today’s Gazette, I really wasn’t sure what to make of it. Headlined, ‘War on coal’ is not a war at all,” the piece makes some good points. But I was worried readers would see it as some sort of violence “call to arms” against the mining industry.
Read a little and you’ll see why:
A real war on coal would be something much different. It would entail sabotage against coal mine equipment and operations, such as derailing coal trains, blowing up bridges, blasting train tunnels, that sort of thing. Desperate people might attempt to mess with mine operations in any number of ways. They might take it on themselves to go after coal trucks and coal haulage roads, strip mine bulldozers, Caterpillar machinery suppliers, coal company law firms, or any number of collaborators in partnership with the coal industry.
People engaged in a war on coal would go after the boards and management of coal companies, their business relations, collaborative financial and accounting firms, sympathetic politicians, and so forth.
… Obviously, the people in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Kentucky are not yet ready to wage a real war on coal. But if enough people get tired of suffering and dying, this could change.
If you read further down to the comments section, you’ll see some people are indeed taking it the way I feared. But after talking to a few people about the piece, I’m convinced that’s not at all what Mike Harman meant — and I’m further convinced that, whether you believe President Obama is out to shut down the entire coal industry or not, everyone from angry laid-off coal miners to top political leaders like Sen. Manchin and Gov. Tomblin, should just stop calling it a “war.”
War is war, folks. People shoot at each other. They drop bombs on each other. We all probably know people who have seen war. To call a political debate a war is insulting to people who actually fought in or died in wars.
People are dying because of coal. A 35-year-old miner became the latest one in an accident this morning in Southern West Virginia. Today in Raleigh County, residents and leaders will gather to honor the 29 who died in the worst coal-mining disaster in a generation.
In his op-ed piece, Mike points out:
I saw recently that around 10,000 coal miners died from black lung disease in the 10-year period from 1995 to 2004. That’s more than the American lives lost in the George Bush wars since 2001. If there is a “war” going on in the mining industry, the body count is piling up entirely on the side of the mine workers, not the industry that finances and runs the mines.
On this blog, I’ve taken to calling the Republican effort to block new mine safety rules, especially one aimed at ending black lung disease, a “war on coal miners.” I was wrong to do that, and I’m going to stop it. Maybe the coal industry’s PR people and political supports would agree to do the same. Maybe someone like Gov. Tomblin or Sen. Manchin would announce their intention to abandon this silly rhetoric, and call on others to join them. It’s worth noting that United Mine Workers President Cecil Roberts, despite some of his far-out rhetoric about President Obama’s coal policies, does not use the phrase “war on coal.”
Mike also wrote this in his op-ed:
A real war on coal might look a lot like the war fought against mine unionization in West Virginia back in the early 1900s, when your chances of survival in a coal mine were worse than surviving in the military engaged in “real” war.
There’s no question that coal’s history in West Virginia has seen its share of real violence. Some of it happened not so long ago. I still remember nearly 20 years ago when I interviewed the young daughter of Eddie York, who was shot and killed during the 1993 coal strike. But I had forgotten that I started off a long Sunday piece about the strike’s impact on families this way:
James Tompkins slammed his pickup to a halt, shattering the quiet on the picket line.
The burly, bearded miner hopped out of the cab. He stomped over, stuck his head under the blue canvas lean-to, and glared at five or six fellow United Mine Workers.
“There’s going to be a lot of trouble on this picket line over this,” Tompkins said, pointing across the bridge to a square particle-board sign.
Black spray-painted letters spelled out, “Scab of the Week.” Poster paper taped to the sign identified Local 2935’s latest target “We’ve got boys whose fathers and sons and brothers are bosses up there, and it’s better just not to talk about it,” he said.
“This is all kin here.” Tompkins’ own son, James Derrick, is a coal company engineer.
Every day on his way to work with other salaried employees, James Derrick crosses the UMW picket line.
“If they put his name up on that sign over there, there’s going to be trouble,” Tompkins vowed later. “Because he’s my son before he’s a boss.
“Your kin people are your kin people before they’re bosses or scabs or anything else,” he said. “And we don’t need to be fighting with each other.
It’s certainly true that pollution from coal-fired power plants causes many, many deaths. And concern is growing about the science that shows residents living near mountaintop removal coal-mining face increased risks of deaths and serious health problems, including cancer and birth defects. But two different people I respect -who come from very different backgrounds and have different political outlooks — told me this morning that they don’t like it much when environmental activists refer to mountaintop removal as “raping Appalachia” or “raping the mountains.” Rape is rape. Mountaintop removal is not rape. I feel the same way when I hear people toss around the word “genocide.” Nobody has written more stories about the public health studies on mountaintop removal. They’re a big concern. But this isn’t genocide.
A friend of mine sometimes worries that in all of the stuff that pretends to be political speech these days we will somehow run out of words. We’ll exaggerate so much that when we see real horror, we won’t have anything left to call it.
We’ve been very fortunate so far that, in all of the heated arguments here about coal mining and mountaintop removal and the industry’s future, nobody has gotten shot. Tempers have boiled. There’s been intimidation and minor incidents. Hopefully this weekend, when activists launch their latest action against a mountaintop removal site, things will again stay peaceful.
War is war. This isn’t war. Let’s call it something else.
Hey folks … Coal Tattoo is going to hopefully be shut down for a while over the next two weeks for the holidays. I hope everyone has a happy and safe Christmas, and that there’s no major breaking news we have to worry about … Be good to each other and check back here after the first of the new year for more coal news and comments.
Two years ago today, I wrote my first post here, called “Welcome to Coal Tattoo.”
Since then, we’ve had more than 1,800 posts and more than 16,500 comments.
Thanks everybody for taking the time to read and comment … Have a good weekend.