We broke the news earlier this morning on the Gazette’s website that federal prosecutors have charged one of the superintendents of the Upper Big Branch with conspiracy in what appears to be the next step toward moving up the chain of Massey Energy management personnel that played a role on the conditions that led to that terrible April 5, 2010, explosion that killed 29 miners.
As we reported:
U.S. Attorney Booth Goodwin alleged that Gary May plotted “with others known and unknown” to put coal production ahead of workers protection and then cover up serious safety violations on numerous occasions during the two years prior to the April 5, 2010, explosion that killed 29 miners.
May is accused of taking part in a scheme to provide advance warning of government inspections and then conceal violations before federal agents could make it into working sections of the sprawling Raleigh County mine.
Also, May is alleged to have ordered an unnamed person to falsify mine examination records by omitting a hazardous condition required to be reported and then repaired.
Prosecutors further allege that May, after learning that federal Mine Safety and Health Administration inspectors were about to sample the level of coal dust in the mine, “surreptitiously redirected” additional fresh air to the area to conceal actual working conditions in the mine.
Goodwin and Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Ruby also allege that May “caused and ordered” the disabling of a methane monitor on a continuous mining machine at Upper Big Branch less than two months before the deadly blast.
Goodwin said in a statement:
Today’s charge is a significant step in the investigation of events at the Upper Big Branch mine. Our investigation of those events remains ongoing.
You can read the charges against May yourself here. But who is Gary May and how important is this development in the sprawling criminal probe of the worst U.S. coal-mining disaster in nearly 40 years?
United States District Attorney R. Booth Goodwin II, left, announces a $210 million agreement with Alpha Natural Resources Inc., in Charleston W.V., Tuesday Dec. 6, 2011, in connection with the criminal investigation of events surrounding the April 5, 2010 explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine that killed 29 men. It is the biggest settlement ever reached in a U.S. mining disaster. Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Ruby, right, looks on. (AP Photo/The Charleston Gazette, Chris Dorst)
But the record made public so far in the Upper Big Branch Mine Disaster contains some interesting things about Gary May, and he wasn’t some low-level section or shift foreman.
If you look for May’s name in published media reports so far, about the only reference you’ll find is a mention in stories based on testimony cited in the detailed report by an independent team headed by longtime mine safety advocate Davitt McAteer. Here’s what one of our stories, based on the McAteer report, said about May:
At about 3 p.m., dispatcher Adams Jenkins got a call from James Woods from the Tailgate 22 crew. Woods was driving a mantrip and asked Jenkins to confirm he had a clear road to the surface.
A couple of minutes later, “that’s when it happened,” Jenkins told investigators.
“All the dust started, just a white smoke pouring out of the portals, and it sounded like thunder,” he said. “It was constant, and I didn’t know what happened. And [mine superintendent] Gary May, he said, ‘Oh, Lord … something bad’s happened.'”
May was also among the mine managers who heroically raced into the Upper Big Branch Mine immediately after the blast, to try to rescue any survivors. May was among those who discovered some of the victims and tried to get as many as possible out alive. As described in the McAteer report, through testimony of foreman Pat Hilbert:
“I could hear Wayne working with Woodsey,” he said. “I could hear Gary May talking to … Steve. But, then all of a sudden, I hear something strange. I thought I heard Steve moan. I turned around and that’s when I guess we lost him because Gary May started CPR on him then.”
But the charging documents filed this morning indicate that May was involved in a fairly well publicized event at Upper Big Branch. It was about two months prior to the explosion and, as reported by NPR and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, involved a then-unnamed mine manager ordered an electrician to disable a methane detector on a continuing mining machine. NPR summarized that incident this way:
On Feb. 13, an electrician deliberately disabled a methane gas monitor on a continuous mining machine because the monitor repeatedly shut down the machine. Three witnesses say the electrician was ordered by a mine supervisor to “bridge” the automatic shutoff mechanism in the monitor.
Readers may recall that, at the time, Massey Energy issued a statement saying there really wasn’t anything wrong with what happened:
The supervisor did not order an electrician to bridge a methane monitor on a continuous miner “to keep the mining machine from shutting off while operating.” The methane monitor was bypassed in order to move the miner from the area that did not have roof support to a safer area for repair.
But here’s one of the allegations prosecutors outlined against Gary May:
In or around February 2010, the legally mandated methane monitor on a continuous mining machine at the Mine stopped operating properly, which caused the continuous mining machine to be automatically deactivated as required by law. MAY caused and ordered the electrical wiring in the methane monitor to be altered to defeat the legally mandated automatic shut-off mechanism, allowing the continuous mining machine to be operated for several hours without a functioning methane monitor.
Interestingly enough, we can now read the sworn testimony of the Upper Big Branch electrician who was involved in this incident. MSHA made public a transcript of electrician George Holtzapfel’s testimony to investigators when it issued its report on the disaster back in December. Among other things, Holtzapfel’s testimony seems to indicate that, after May told him to disable the methane detector, mining continued without that important piece of safety equipment:
Well, I walked away from it and they fired it back up and chewed them belt channels.
May has also come up in other aspects of the Upper Big Branch investigation. For example, Gina Jones told investigators that her husband, explosion victim Dean Jones, complained to Gary May about ventilation problems in the mine. Rock duster Nathaniel Jeter told investigators that May didn’t like him complaining about safety problems and was aware of problems getting the Upper Big Branch Mine properly rock-dusted to control explosive coal dust. Among other things, Jeter indicated in his sworn testimony that Gary May was among the mine managers who would only ensure proper rock-dusting when federal inspectors — “company” — were expected underground:
When he knew we had company come by, the entries, like the drift mouth and stuff like that on either parts of the mine, would be dusted. And I would be wondering, how did this get white because I don’t remember dusting this. And I’d hear from one of the guys that Gary May or either one of his guys that he had on his team dusted the drift mouth …
And certainly, some of the allegations against May, outlined in the charging document filed this morning, are very serious things. For example, prosecutors alleged:
On an occasion between February 2008 and April 5, 2010, May, knowing that MSHA was about to sample the level of respirable dust in a certain area of the mine, surreptitiously redirected additional air to that area of the mine to conceal and cover up the quantity of air that would have reached that area of the mine under normal circumstances.
Most interesting, though, is that May was charged not with criminal violations that are specifically outlined in the federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, but with the more general crime of conspiracy. in a strategy that federal prosecutors have rarely used against bad actors in the coal industry (see here, here and here for a few examples). This means he wasn’t acting alone. In the words of the charging document, there were “others known and unknown” who “combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed together with each other” to defraud the U.S. government “to wit, to hamper, hinder, impede, and obstruct by trickery, deciet and dishonest means” efforts by MSHA to protect the health and safety of Upper Big Branch’s workers.
And, as the other media reports (see here and here ) have also indicated, the charging of Mr. May through an “information” almost certainly indicates that he’s cooperating with prosecutors, has reached some sort of a plea agreement and — perhaps — is going to be providing testimony that moves this investigation along up the corporate ladder.
I spoke with Davitt McAteer just a few minutes ago, after he had finished reading the charging documents concerning Mr. May, and this is what he had to say:
The nature of the allegations and the fact that Mr. May was a supervisor suggests they are taking a broader look and at the higher levels of the organization. It’s encouraging, especially the fact that Mr. May is cooperating.