Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is having a news conference right now to announce his agency’s plans to try to undo the Bush administration’s changes to the stream buffer zone rule.
Salazar said his agency is going to ask a federal court to send the rule back to Interior, and then plans to reopen a public comment period on the controversial rule change. The rule is current pending in court, because environmental groups filed a legal challenge to the Bush administration’s changes.
Salazar said his agency wants for the time being to revert to the 1983 version of the buffer zone rule, which he said most states are still using, and which, Salazar said, provides more protections to streams.
But most of Salazar’s news conference appeared aimed at reassuring the coal industry that Obama has no plans to do anything that would hamper continued production.
“We will continue to use coal as a significant part of our energy portfolio,” Salazar said.
[UPDATED: Importantly, the Obama administration has not said how it plans to interpret the buffer zone rule. The rule (prior to the Bush administration re-write) prohibited mining activities within 100 feet of perennial and intermittent streams. But regulators treated the rule with a wink and a nod, until environmentalists and federal judges began demanding enforcement. Will Obama actually enforce the rule? We don’t know yet].
Stay tuned for more on this development later … but for now, here’s the Interior Department’s press release:
Salazar Moves to Withdraw
11th Hour Mountaintop Coal Mining Rule
Restores Protections Against Dumping in Streams
WASHINGTON, D.C. â€“ Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today announced his determination that the mountaintop coal mining â€œstream buffer zone ruleâ€ issued by the Bush Administration is legally defective. Â Salazar directed the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to file a pleading with the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. requesting that the rule be vacated due to this deficiency and remanded to the Department of the Interior for further action.
â€œIn its last weeks in office, the Bush Administration pushed through a rule that allows coal mine operators to dump mountaintop fill into streambeds if itâ€™s found to be the cheapest and most convenient disposal option,â€ said Secretary Salazar. Â â€œWe must responsibly develop our coal supplies to help us achieve energy independence, but we cannot do so without appropriately assessing the impact such development might have on local communities and natural habitat and the species it supports.â€
Under the Bush rule, coal mine operators are able to dispose of excess mountaintop spoil in perennial and intermittent streams and within 100 feet of those streams whenever alternative options are deemed “not reasonably possible.” Â Disposal into streambeds is permissible when alternatives are considered “unreasonable,” which occurs under the Bush rule whenever the cost of pursuing an alternative “is substantially greaterâ€ than normal costs.
The Bush rule replaced a rule that had been on the books since the Reagan era rule of 1983. The Reagan era rule provides greater protection for communities and habitat by allowing the dumping of overburden within 100 feet of a perennial or intermittent stream only upon finding that such activities â€œwill not adversely affect the water quantity or quality or other environmental resources of the stream. Â Two lawsuits were filed immediately after the Bush rule was published.
â€œThe so-called â€˜stream buffer zone ruleâ€™ simply doesnâ€™t pass muster with respect to adequately protecting water quality and stream habitat that communities rely on in coal country,â€ added Salazar.
If the court accepts the United States’ request and vacates and remands the rule, the 1983 rule will continue to remain in force in all of the states that have delegated authority under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA). (Only two states, Washington and Tennessee, do not have delegated authority under SMCRA.)
OSM expects to issue guidance to states regarding application of the 1983 rule. Â Also, OSM expects to solicit comment on the potential development of a comprehensive new stream buffer zone rule that would update the 1983 rule, address ambiguities and fill interpretational gaps, while implementing the statutory requirements set forth in the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act and ensuring that SMCRA requirements are coordinated with Clean Water Act obligations that are administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency.