Coal Tattoo

UMWA to Congress: Go slow on greenhouse reductions

Share This Article
Share This Article
[wp_social_sharing social_options='facebook,twitter,googleplus,linkedin,pinterest' facebook_text='Share on Facebook' twitter_text='Share on Twitter' googleplus_text='Share on Google+' linkedin_text='Share on Linkedin' pinterest_text='Share on Pinterest' icon_order='f,t,g,l,p' show_icons='1' before_button_text='' social_image='']

The House Energy and Commerce Hearings are continuing today on the American Clean Energy and Security Act. This afternoon’s panels include one that focuses on Low Carbon Electricity, Carbon Capture and Storage, Renewables, and Grid Modernization

trisko.jpgAmong those testifying will be Eugene Trisko, a lawyer who represents the United Mine Workers union on global warming issues. I’ll post a link to his complete testimony in a bit, but here’s the summary put out by the UMW’s communications department:

In his remarks, Trisko made it clear that the UMWA believes that “achieving the proper balance among technology incentives and the timing and stringency of emissions reductions will be essential for obtaining bipartisan support for climate legislation.

    “The UMWA recognizes that climate change legislation poses the greatest threat to its membership and to the continued use of coal,” Trisko said. “That is why the union has chosen to engage in the legislative process instead of standing on the sidelines, reduced to throwing rhetorical bombs and engaging in political grandstanding about this legislation.”

   Trisko pointed out that with half of America’s energy currently generated by coal, and with 23 states relying on coal for more than half of their electric supplies, no renewable energy technology currently exists that could replace coal as an energy source, and the reality is that such technology will not be available for decades in enough capacity to meet America’s energy needs.

    “Reducing coal in our energy mix means using another fuel to replace it for baseload generation, most likely a combination of nuclear and natural gas,” Trisko said.

    Trisko pointed out the areas of the legislation the UMWA supports, including language that calls for support of the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. He summarized a recent study undertaken by BBC Research and Consulting showing that “deployment of 65 to 100 gigawatts of new advanced coal capacity with CCS could create 5-7 million job-years of employment during construction and more than a
quarter-million new permanent jobs.”     

    Trisko questioned the emissions reduction targets in the legislation, notably the 20 percent reduction called for by 2020. “The UMWA urges moderation in the choice of the 2020 target,” Trisko said, “recommending that the majority of emission reductions required by the bill occur later in the program when technological advances should facilitate the
continued use of coal.”